The Saints Hold All The Cards in 2026, Should NOT Designate Derek Carr a Post-June-1 Cut

After Derek Carr's full money restructure, everyone who's anyone is suggesting the Saints could move on by designating Derek Carr a post-June-1 cut in 2026. Not only is this not the Saints best option, but it would provide absolutely no benefit to the team. The best option for the Saints in the 2026 offseason would be threatening to actually cut Derek Carr after June 1, 2026.

The misunderstanding stems from a key difference in the Saints upcoming contract situation with Derek Carr in the 2026 offseason as opposed to the 2024 and 2025 offseasons. In the 2024 and 2025 offseasons Derek Carr's contract contained language that would trigger guarantees if he was still on the roster on a certain date in March of those offseasons. During the 2024 offseason, Derek Carr's 2024 base salary was already guaranteed, but there was a trigger to guarantee his 2025 roster bonus if he was not cut early. During the 2025 offseason, Derek Carr's 2025 roster bonus was thus already guaranteed, but his 2025 base salary was not yet guaranteed until that trigger date, though the choice to restructure his contract effectively guaranteed it early. During the 2026 offseason, there are no triggers in Derek Carr's contract. He has a $50 million base salary for 2026, but it is not guaranteed, and contains no trigger to guarantee it until Week 1 of 2026. A post-June-1 cut designation does not result in any cap savings prior to June 1, but allows a player to move on to a new team immediately. As such, a post-June-1 cut designation only has two possible benefits:

There is no reason to use a post-June-1 cut designation on Derek Carr in the 2026 offseason because neither of these situations apply. Derek Carr, in refusing to consider a pay cut, using his injury as leverage, and abandoning New Orleans during the Super Bowl did not always do right by the team and has earned no good will. He has said he would honor his contract and has made business decisions, so the Saints should do the same. He has no triggers to guarantee any money during the 2026 offseason if the Saints delay their decision to cut him until sometime during June-August.

The Saints several options for the 2026 offseason that could make sense with Derek Carr:

All these options could make sense. One option makes no sense. The option everyone seems to be suggesting of using a post-June-1 designation to cut Carr in March 2026. That move would provide no immediate cap benefit at that time, avoid no triggers or guarantees, provide no more post-June-1 benefit that waiting until its actually post-June-1, and waste a scarce resource of post-June-1 designation slots. The only one who would benefit from the Saints designating Carr a post-June-1 cut in March, 2026 would be to Derek Carr, whose free agent value would be maximized by hitting the market in March while the Saints get no benefit until June. Derek Carr always put himself first, and there is no reason for the Saints to make more bad business decisions to benefit Carr who would never do the same for them.

But there are two even worse decisions the Saints could make:

If the Saints have a new GM in 2026, hopefully they will not make these two mistakes. The Saints choosing to restructure Carr and guarantee his bloated 2025 salary was a mistake, but once that check was cashed the cards are in the Saints hands for any future decisions. If Derek Carr refuses to take a pay cut, refuses to consider trades, and puts only Derek Carr first, the Saints can put the Saints first too. The Saints hold all the power to keep Derek Carr on the roster through August without guaranteeing him anything but a $3,000 a week training camp and preseason stipend, and then to cut him loose at the last second, announcing that Jake Haener beat him out for a roster spot after he red-shirted camp and preseason. That leverage means power. Finally, Derek Carr can be the one making the hard decisions in the offseason.